<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Optimus Pete &#187; Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/category/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.petegraham.co.uk</link>
	<description>yes i love technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:06:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>My Apology to Tom from mySpace</title>
		<link>http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/03/08/my-apology-to-tom-from-myspace/</link>
		<comments>http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/03/08/my-apology-to-tom-from-myspace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quick time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/03/08/my-apology-to-tom-from-myspace/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other week I wrote a rant about mySpace mp3 downloads I was also a little bit rude about Tom from mySpace. I was angry because songs on mySpace kept getting streamed in my browser instead of downloaded, I thought it was something Tom had done, in actual fact Tom wasn’t the culprit at all, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other week I wrote a <a href="http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/02/21/why-myspace-music-downloads-are-rubbish/">rant about mySpace</a> mp3 downloads I was also a little bit <a target="_blank" href="http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/02/22/argh-why-myspace-does-my-nut-in/">rude about Tom</a> from mySpace. I was angry because songs on mySpace kept getting streamed in my browser instead of downloaded, I thought it was something Tom had done, in actual fact Tom wasn’t the culprit at all, the real villain was none other than Steve Jobs!</p>
<p>Recently I had installed iTunes on my PC at work, these days iTunes comes bundled with QuickTime. When QuickTime installed, it forced mp3 files in FireFox to be associated with itself rather than be saved to disk (which was my previous default).</p>
<p>To solve this irritating problem load up FireFox click on Tools then Options.</p>
<p><img id="image70" alt="ff1.png" src="http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/ff1.png" /></p>
<p>Next click on the content tab, click the manage button in the file types section at the bottom.</p>
<p><img id="image71" alt="ff2.png" src="http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/ff2.png" /></p>
<p>You’ll see a big list of file which have been associated with Quicktime, find mp3 files in the list and click on the button that says “remove action” to remove its association with Quicktime. When you click on hyperlinks to mp3s you should now get the prompt to open or save.</p>
<p>I’d like to take this chance to publicly apologise to Tom from mySpace as I know he’s very sensitive about mockery especially when it comes from a prominent member of the blogosphere like myself!</p>
<p>/* Pete Graham */</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/03/08/my-apology-to-tom-from-myspace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wii Mac Advert Parody</title>
		<link>http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/02/21/wii-mac-advert-parody/</link>
		<comments>http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/02/21/wii-mac-advert-parody/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wii]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/02/21/wii-mac-advert-parody/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So there&#8217;s been some banter on this blog about the &#8220;Mac vs PC&#8221; advert spoofs over on YouTube. I&#8217;ve watched a few of them and this Wii VS PS3 spoof is current favorite. Enjoy!

/* Pete Graham */
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So there&#8217;s been some banter on this blog about the &#8220;Mac vs PC&#8221; advert spoofs over on YouTube. I&#8217;ve watched a few of them and this <a target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXm5n2n_U3c">Wii VS PS3 spoof</a> is current favorite. Enjoy!</p>
<p><img id="image59" alt="wii_vs_ps3.png" src="http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/wii_vs_ps3.png" /></p>
<p>/* Pete Graham */</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/02/21/wii-mac-advert-parody/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Smug) Peep Show UK Mac Adverts</title>
		<link>http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/02/20/smug-peep-show-uk-mac-adverts/</link>
		<comments>http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/02/20/smug-peep-show-uk-mac-adverts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peep Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/02/20/smug-peep-show-uk-mac-adverts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple has released some UK only adverts which feature the comedy duo Michelle and Web from the peek show. These adverts are a reworking of their Americans ones which feature one character as a PC; who is slightly uptight, uncool has bad hair and a bad suit. The Mac character on the other hand is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple has released some UK only adverts which feature the comedy duo Michelle and Web from the peek show. These adverts are a reworking of their Americans ones which feature one character as a PC; who is slightly uptight, uncool has bad hair and a bad suit. The Mac character on the other hand is laidback, friendly and hip. The adverts show the two characters interacting in various scenarios which help to point out how the Mac is great for “fun stuff” and the PC is best suited for business use.</p>
<p><img alt="macad.png" id="image57" src="http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/macad.png" /></p>
<p>Personally I found the adverts quite amusing the first time I saw them (I’m now sick of them because they’re on the UK version of mySpace all the bloody time), did the adverts make me want to buy a Mac? No they didn’t. The reason for this the same reason other Mac adverts have irritated me in the past, they’re quite smug! The casting of Michelle and Web probably doesn’t help as we know their characters from the peep show. So before the advert begins I was imagining the “PC” character as being a quite likable but bumbling oaf, and the “Mac” character as being a slightly irritating pretentious twat.</p>
<p>I wondered if it was just me that saw the add like this because I’d watched a lot of the peep show but there is an <a target="_blank" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/6343789.stm">article on the BBC site</a> which voices very similar opinions. Maybe Apple underestimated how well known the comedy duo were in England.</p>
<p>Now I’m not anti-Apple, I used to own a iPod until it broke. One of the thing that I have found about some Mac owners is they will quite happily bore you about how much better Macs are than PCs with a slightly smug look on their face. Becoming one of these is the reason more than anything that&#8217;s prevented me from buying/using Macs. Is this attitude reflected by the adverts or caused by them? Your guess is as good as mine.</p>
<p># Pete Graham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/02/20/smug-peep-show-uk-mac-adverts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPod is the new CD, and 3 different iPhones?</title>
		<link>http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/02/08/ipod-is-the-new-cd-and-3-different-iphones/</link>
		<comments>http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/02/08/ipod-is-the-new-cd-and-3-different-iphones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/02/08/ipod-is-the-new-cd-and-3-different-iphones/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple Overlord Steve Jobs has also been getting his bearded face in the papers because he’s finally managed to settle the legal dispute between Apple Computers (now just Apple) and the Beatles owned Apple records. Interestedly Apple is now able to sell iPods preloaded with music. iPod will be the New CD is an interesting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple Overlord Steve Jobs has also been getting his bearded face in the papers because he’s finally managed to settle the legal dispute between Apple Computers (now just Apple) and the Beatles owned Apple records. Interestedly Apple is now able to sell iPods preloaded with music. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.wired.com/news/columns/0,72656-0.html?tw=rss.technology">iPod will be the New CD</a> is an interesting article which explores the idea that if iPod Shuffle can be sold cheaply enough preloaded with music they could completely replace CD’s. I though this theory was bizarre at first but iPod Shuffle’s are essentially flash memory drives with a few microchips for the firmware. Flash memory sticks are so cheap these days that many companies give them away like pens or key-rings. The articles author Leander Kahney speculates that the Shuffle’s could be skinned to make them more collectable, it’s certainly a good concept.</p>
<p><img title="Theoretical iPhone range" alt="Theoretical iPhone range" src="http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/iphone_2.png" /><br />
There is an <a target="_blank" href="http://www.informationarchitects.jp/iphone-nano-iphone-shuffle">interesting article</a> on Information Architects about a theoretical iPhone range. The article is quite detailed and explains the features each model would offer and the type of consumer they would appeal to. I can’t see anything like these actual models produced as they suggest dropping music playback from the iPhone, but I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if Apple do attempt to create a range of iPhones.</p>
<p>One topic the article touches upon is the huge scope for simplification and reduction of facilities in modern mobile phones. You might want the latest phone with mp3 player, camera, and video games but your Gran probably doesn’t.</p>
<p>To read my previous iPhone pondering <a href="http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/11/iphone-iponderings/">click here</a>.</p>
<p>/* Pete Graham */</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/02/08/ipod-is-the-new-cd-and-3-different-iphones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beginning of the End for DRM?</title>
		<link>http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/02/08/beginning-of-the-end-for-drm/</link>
		<comments>http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/02/08/beginning-of-the-end-for-drm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/02/08/beginning-of-the-end-for-drm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been much discussion in the media this week about DRM (Digital Rights Management) and downloadable music. Apple Overlord Steve Jobs has done a U-turn and now decided that he doesn&#8217;t like DRM, Jobs has told the press that the only reason songs downloaded from his iTunes store are locked with DRM is because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been much discussion in the media this week about DRM (Digital Rights Management) and downloadable music. Apple Overlord Steve Jobs has done a U-turn and now decided that he doesn&#8217;t like DRM, Jobs has told the press that the only reason songs downloaded from his iTunes store are locked with DRM is because &#8220;the big record companies made me do it&#8221;. Sceptics are saying this sudden change of heart is mainly due to new European DRM legislation which means come Summer Apple may not be able to sell downloadable music with their currently DRM setup in some countries.<br />
<img src="http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/steve-jobs-photomosaic.jpg" /><br />
Personally I&#8217;d love to have the convenience of downloading music from the iTunes store, the reason I don&#8217;t is I refuse to pay money for music locked into being stored on one computer and one device. If I go to the shops to buy a CD (or order CDs from Amazon) its less convenient but once I&#8217;ve got that CD I can rip, and then move or copy the files to which ever computer or mp3 player I want to use. Majority of digital Music is ripped from CDs, so why would people be anymore likely to copy just because it was downloaded?</p>
<p>The other reason I don&#8217;t use the iTunes store is I don&#8217;t think its great value for money. If I buy a CD it&#8217;s around the same price as downloading the Album but I get a nice case and a booklet, I can put that on a shelf with other CDs and impress chicks. I&#8217;d like to see Apple offer a subscription based service where the user pays a set free for as many downloads as they like. If people had no download cap on the iTunes store why would they bother &#8220;illegally&#8221; swapping mp3s with each other anyway?</p>
<p>Interesting Bill Gates stated in December 2006 that he feels that digital copy protection for music and video is too complex. Hopefully with big names in Technology realising that DRM is a problem this could be the begging of the end for DRM, but I wouldn&#8217;t hold my breath.</p>
<p><img src="http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/bill.jpg" /></p>
<p># Pete Graham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/02/08/beginning-of-the-end-for-drm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone iPonderings</title>
		<link>http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/11/iphone-iponderings/</link>
		<comments>http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/11/iphone-iponderings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/11/iphone-iponderings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday this week Mac Overlord Steve Jobs unveiled the iPhone after months of speculation what the device would look like and how it would work. Now there’s no doubt that Apple with shift millions of these devices, Steve Jobs could announce a new product called the iTurd [1] and millions of Apple fanatics would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday this week Mac Overlord Steve Jobs unveiled the iPhone after months of speculation what the device would look like and how it would work. Now there’s no doubt that Apple with shift millions of these devices, Steve Jobs could announce a new product called the <a target="_blank" href="http://twowaybidet.com/2005/mob/iturd/">iTurd</a> [1] and millions of Apple fanatics would still rush out to buy it. The real question is not if the device will be successful but how successful will the device will be?</p>
<p><img alt="steve jobs with iPhone on screen behind him" title="steve jobs with iPhone on screen behind him" src="http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/iphone1.jpg" /><br />
Most people have an mp3 player and a phone; combining the industries best selling mp3 player and a phone makes excellent sense, one device less hassle. What Apple is aiming to do is much more ambitious they are attempting to create a portable multimedia device that will have mainstream appeal.<span id="more-4"></span></p>
<p><img title="iPhone size comparison" alt="iPhone size comparison" src="http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/sizeasy.png" /><br />
Looking at the above size comparison from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sizeasy.com/">sizeasy.com</a> the iPhone is slightly bigger than a 30gb iPod and a normal mobile phone (its exact dimensions are 115mm x 61mm x 11.6mm). It is smaller than most PDA’s (It’s worth bearing in mind that the iPhone will have a 4GB or 8GB flash memory so is actually a combination of a iPod Nano and a mobile).</p>
<p>Apple are often praised for their highly innovative products, I would argue that many of Apples products aren’t particularly innovative at all. However Apple does produce highly polished products with effective user interfaces and stylish designs. This makes their products highly desirable and is why there is often such a cult surrounding them.</p>
<p>Heres a list of the key features that the iPhone is meant to achieve:</p>
<ul>
<li>Play mp3’s</li>
<li>Make phone calls</li>
<li>Browse the web</li>
<li>Send emails</li>
<li>Take photo’s</li>
<li>Video Playback</li>
</ul>
<p>An impressive list, but if you cut thought the hype there isn’t much that is being offered that can’t be done by high spec PDA or Smart Phones which are currently available, and the iPhone will not be on sale until June.</p>
<p>I believe how good the iPhone will be as a multimedia lifestyle device will be determined by four major factors:</p>
<ol>
<li>Touch screen</li>
<li>Internet</li>
<li>User interfaces</li>
<li>Durability</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Touch Screen</strong><br />
I used to use a PDA however I found that it took too long to input data with it. Either you had to use the hand writing recognition software which was rubbish or use the stylus to point at characters on a onscreen keyboard, very slow. Blackberry’s have full QWERTY keyboards but they’re tiny. With the iPhone apple claim to have patented a revolutionary touch screen technology, if the touch screen works genuinely well then this reason alone could justify buying one instead of a smart-phone/PDA alternative.</p>
<p><strong>Internet</strong><br />
People are becoming more reliant on Internet services as time goes on. Even though Internet connectivity has been offered on mobile phones by various means for the past few years it has never taken off. This is probably because it tends to be very expensive to connect on most mobile tariffs and if you do manage to connect its painfully slow. The interesting thing to see will be if Apple can achieve decent connection speeds and what sort of coverage the iPhone will get. Apparently they want to offer music and movie downloads so their going to need some fast speeds.</p>
<p>Like a PDA the iPhone features Wi-Fi connectivity, this is a nice feature however at this point in time not many public places in Britain offer Wi-Fi access. This means the only places you’ll be able to use the Wi-Fi is your house or your office where your likely to have a Computer anyway so why bother using a portable device?</p>
<p><strong>User-Interface</strong><br />
I used to own a 4th Generation iPod and I was very impressed with its user-interface; it was intuitive and common tasks could be achieved with minimal effort. Early mobile phones especially Nokia’s had fairly good UI’s however as extra features crept in they began to lose some of their simplicity and elegance. I currently use a Samsung D500, when I get a new message it takes 5 button presses before I can actually read it, my old Nokia 3310 took 2.</p>
<p>The iPhone is an ambitious project but if Apple can keep it so core features can be achieved quickly and effectively this will be a huge selling point.</p>
<p><img alt="iPhone front and back" title="iPhone front and back" src="http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/iphone2.jpg" /></p>
<p><strong>Duabilty</strong><br />
The hard-drive on the 4th Gen iPod I owned broke after 14 months; the 1st Gen iPod Nano’s had defects with the screen’s cracking.  Majority of people I know that have owned iPods have had them break. You can’t really have an essential digital lifestyle device if it’s likely to break on you at any minute. Apple really have to make sure the durability on the iPhone is good otherwise it just won’t be worth buying. It will be interesting to see if insurance is offered on iPhones like it is on mobile phone contracts.</p>
<p>I look forward to having a play with an iPhone when it’s released. Will I be buying one, no, well not straight away anyway I’ll probably give it 6 months and see if the people who were raving about them when they initially came out still rate them. I do think convergent devices are the way forward, for a while when I was carrying a mobile, PDA, iPod and laptop around with me I was starting to feel like inspector gadget. Maybe we can all read this article again in a years time and mock me for my ridiculous predictions.</p>
<p>// Pete Graham</p>
<p>[1] UrbanDitionary.com has this definition of the word iTurd: When you drop your iPod in the toilet</p>
<p><em>“I was such a fucking dumbass, I dropped my brand new iPod in the toilet, now it&#8217;s a iTurd.”</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tech.petegraham.co.uk/2007/01/11/iphone-iponderings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

